All four were supporters of the Revolutionary Communist Party and/or the Revolutionary Communist Youth Brigade. Eichman was a member of the Coalition Opposed to Censorship in the Arts, and Blalock was a member of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War Anti-Imperialist.
![university of tennessee burning gay flag vs american flag university of tennessee burning gay flag vs american flag](http://freedomfightersforamerica.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/images/image009.226153424_std.jpg)
Scott had recently aroused controversy with a "flag on the floor" exhibit at the Art Institute of Chicago. Johnson, staged a protest together with three companions – artists Dread Scott and Shawn Eichman and Vietnam veteran David Blalock – by burning flags on the steps of the United States Capitol building before a crowd of reporters and photographers. In Washington, D.C., Gregory Lee Johnson, the defendant in Texas v. None of the four had been among the organizers of the demonstration or had previously known each other. None of the four were members or supporters of VVAW-AI or the Revolutionary Communist Party. No one was arrested during the demonstration, but four people identified from photographs were later charged with violating the federal Flag Protection Act of 1989: Mark Haggerty, Jennifer Campbell, Darius Strong and Carlos Garza. In Seattle, flags were burned at a demonstration organized by the Vietnam Veterans Against the War Anti-Imperialist outside the Capitol Hill post office shortly after midnight, moments after the law took effect. Demonstrators at two of these incidents, in Seattle and Washington, D.C., were arrested and charged under the revised statute. On the day that the law took effect, protests were staged around the nation. Johnson, the 101st Congress passed the Flag Protection Act of 1989, which attempted to circumvent the Johnson ruling by prohibiting mistreatment of the flag without regard to any message being conveyed. Johnson (1989), which invalidated on First Amendment grounds a Texas state statute banning flag burning. It built on the opinion handed down in the Court's decision the prior year in Texas v. It was argued together with the case United States v.
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE BURNING GAY FLAG VS AMERICAN FLAG FREE
310 (1990), is a United States Supreme Court case that invalidated a federal law against flag desecration as violating of free speech under the First Amendment. Stevens, joined by Rehnquist, White, O'Connor īrennan, joined by Marshall, Blackmun, Scalia, Kennedy The Flag Protection Act of 1989 is unconstitutional.Ĭhief Justice William Rehnquist Associate Justices William J. The interest on the part of the government to protect the America flag as a symbol did not outweigh the individual right to disparage that symbol through expressive conduct.
![university of tennessee burning gay flag vs american flag university of tennessee burning gay flag vs american flag](http://assets.suredone.com/1868/media-pics/sd3579-greetings-from-tennessee-postcard-fridge-magnet-nashville-memphis-gatlinburg.jpeg)
1990) Ĭonsolidated, probable jurisdiction noted, 494 U.S.